Difference between revisions of "Template talk:SongNav"

From JoCopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Yet another voting situation, yet another "weak keep" vote -- I'm so timid)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
Comments are invited! Improvements, criticisms, bugs--post about them here. &mdash; <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Wesley|Wesley]]</span> | 06:02, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
 
Comments are invited! Improvements, criticisms, bugs--post about them here. &mdash; <span style="font-variant:small-caps">[[User:Wesley|Wesley]]</span> | 06:02, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
 
: Actually, I think I slightly prefer the current one, provided it gets taken off the main song pages and left on the lyrics, videos, etc. page, which is still what I have in mind. I agree that it takes up too much room on the main page, but on the other pages, there may not be that much else going on for it to distract from. (I don't have any objection to the revision, either, though.) --[[User:Bry|Bry]] 08:19, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
 
: Actually, I think I slightly prefer the current one, provided it gets taken off the main song pages and left on the lyrics, videos, etc. page, which is still what I have in mind. I agree that it takes up too much room on the main page, but on the other pages, there may not be that much else going on for it to distract from. (I don't have any objection to the revision, either, though.) --[[User:Bry|Bry]] 08:19, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
 +
:: What I don't quite understand from the plans is why are we apparently keeping the top SongNav if we're going to have the links in the InfoBox on the side?  It's redundant.  I like having it on the side and eliminate the top nav bar. --[[User:MitchO|MitchO]] 09:52, 4 May 2008 (EDT)

Revision as of 09:52, 4 May 2008

New SongNav layout

Old



Proposed User:Wesley/SongNav

I've got an idea for a new SongNav layout. Yes, that's essentially just the Categories bar modified with links to the various song-related pages. However, it satisfies a few of my personal gripes with the old SongNav:

  1. It's less big-and-in-your-face. Being at the top of the page is enough attention.
  2. It doesn't wrap to several lines long all the time. As I type this, the old SongNav is 3 vertical lines long.

Comments are invited! Improvements, criticisms, bugs--post about them here. — Wesley | 06:02, 4 May 2008 (EDT)

Actually, I think I slightly prefer the current one, provided it gets taken off the main song pages and left on the lyrics, videos, etc. page, which is still what I have in mind. I agree that it takes up too much room on the main page, but on the other pages, there may not be that much else going on for it to distract from. (I don't have any objection to the revision, either, though.) --Bry 08:19, 4 May 2008 (EDT)
What I don't quite understand from the plans is why are we apparently keeping the top SongNav if we're going to have the links in the InfoBox on the side? It's redundant. I like having it on the side and eliminate the top nav bar. --MitchO 09:52, 4 May 2008 (EDT)