Difference between revisions of "User talk:Wesley/SongDetails"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(New page: Hey, Wesley, sorry to keep bothering you! I like how you've incorporated the related pages into this one. I'm not sure I understand why the title needs to be a link, though. Is this infobo...) |
(Maybe reorder the info (put related links further down)?) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
But in case I didn't emphasize this enough, I really, really like how it's looking so far. --[[User:Bry|Bry]] 23:43, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | But in case I didn't emphasize this enough, I really, really like how it's looking so far. --[[User:Bry|Bry]] 23:43, 28 April 2008 (EDT) | ||
+ | :Oops, should've mentioned -- I'd want the "related links" under the actual song info (length, album, etc.). You'll want to get more input on that, though. --[[User:Bry|Bry]] 23:45, 28 April 2008 (EDT) |
Revision as of 23:45, 28 April 2008
Hey, Wesley, sorry to keep bothering you! I like how you've incorporated the related pages into this one. I'm not sure I understand why the title needs to be a link, though. Is this infobox going to be used anywhere other than the song page itself? I'd think the existing SongNav template, or some version of it, should stay on the related pages -- as always, just my opinion.
(Maybe I'm just internalizing the TMBW way of doing things -- they've got the "lyrics / interpretations / etc." nav-bar on the top of the related pages but a different link-box for the main song page.)
But in case I didn't emphasize this enough, I really, really like how it's looking so far. --Bry 23:43, 28 April 2008 (EDT)
- Oops, should've mentioned -- I'd want the "related links" under the actual song info (length, album, etc.). You'll want to get more input on that, though. --Bry 23:45, 28 April 2008 (EDT)